FastLoan4Me
Complaint 234689 Details
- Date Occurred: 04/26/2013
- Reported Damages: $30.00
- Location: Unknown
The complaint is against an online dating profile
The complaint is a listing fraud posted on public forums or sites against an anonymous entity
The complaint is mobile text spam or smishing related against an anonymous entity
The company or person contact no longer exists
International boundaries
$30.00 USD were withdrawn from my bank account unauthorized. I have no idea who they are & never spoke to them before. I tried called the number on the digital check they made to my account & it goes to voicemail
Phone Number: (775) 200-1525
- tjulian488 SBID #964539ee36
- Posted 04/27/2013
Comments
- tjulian488 SBID #964539ee36
- Posted 04/27/2013
-
In reference to this complaint, let it be known, certain items on a check is considered crucial in justifying it's validity. One most important feature on a check is the signature line. It is called a signature line for various reasons. 10 to 15 years ago, there were no such thing as a machine initiated authorization for signing a check. A check without a signature was considered nonvalid. Today, we cannot afford to allow mechanical signatures as an authorization for the same reason there weren't any such authorization 10 or 15 years ago. Yes, in binding documents, understandable. A check is a check and the safety ramifications used yesterday to establish it's validity is needed today, moreso. I question the authority who seem to feel we consumers are safe with mechanical signatures authorizing checks to be handled in such a manner. Bank lockbox operations are critical. It seems we cannot ill afford to relax in our discretion when processing this type of banking activity. Furthermore, a check printed with an account/routing number is not something you can go down to the local grocery store, or Staples and buy. A bank has to authorize the release of such materials at an expense. So, this entire episode is really ridiculous when you think about the process involved. To make any kind of profit in this business, FastLoan4Me would have to locate each target customer, request blank checks with account/routing numbers, order checks and start typing checks. The company in question seem to believe they can continue to debit the same account from one month to the next, even after it has been proven, illegitimate. So, therefore they must have a stockpile of blank checks with the same account and routing number on them. How can these folks get there hands on these blank checks? Are the banks given these checks away.
Electronic signature on checks is bad news. We need to go back to the days of yesterday when handling checks. The proof is in this document. Rough draft! -
- thumb up
- 1
- thumb down
- 0
- flag
Similar User Submitted Complaints ▼
FastLoan4Me.com Phone Number Complaint 349245 for $56.00
-
get started. After you submit a complaint, you can view your complaint status in your dashboard....
-
Anonymous - Posted on 05/16/2016
Do You Have a Complaint?
Add a complaint and spread the word. High volume complaints have a better chance to get their money back. Submit a report and join forces with others like you!
Submit a Complaint NowBusiness Profile Summary
Company Statistics
- Complaint Against FastLoan4Me.com
- Complaints Filed: 909
- Reported Damages: $81,388.60
What is SBID?
SBID is a unique id code that identifies the user's computer and location. SBID is used to prevent fraudulent postings and help our community find users who create duplicate user accounts.