Kiosk Ad-venture Inc Lori Eilar
Complaint 30618 Details

  • Date Occurred: 09/19/2013
  • Reported Damages: $101,455.95
  • !

The complaint is against an online dating profile

The complaint is a listing fraud posted on public forums or sites against an anonymous entity

The complaint is mobile text spam or smishing related against an anonymous entity

The company or person contact no longer exists

International boundaries

We are victims of domestic abuse and in shelters. She said she would help us. She told me to give her a short term loan from my IRA and she would give us our money back in that same month so he could not find and track us down. I did and as soon as she cashed my check, she started to blackmail, and extort the money and threaten the safety of me and my children and tell us she was going to tell him where we are in our safe houses. Then she wrote a hot check to me for $91,455.95 and kept 10,000 of my money IRA. But that check bounced. She was taking money out of this account. She said she was going to put my name on the account but never did. chase bank said she was taking money out so the check would bounce. She is now attacking me to justify her theft and scam. She lied about this business and she is a fraud. We are araid for not only our lives but now she left us without our funds that we need to survive and have shelter. Please help us.

Do You Have a Complaint?

Submit a Complaint

Comments

  • WRONGLYACCUSED
  • WRONGLYACCUSED SBID #bd1e06f215
  • Posted 10/31/2013
  • The filer of this complaint is Terri Lynn Framel Robertson and now goes by Terri Smith on Facebook. Her false claims against me Lori Eilar and my company Kiosk Ad-Venture, Inc are slanderous and libel. Court suits are being filed against her and sites like this one is being used as proof of her slander and now her written LIBEL. What Ms Robertson fails to mention here is that her Court order of Protection against her ex husband John William Robertson in Oklahoma City was DENIED. She also fails to mention that she fled Oklahoma from a PENDING CIVIL SUIT FILED AGAINST HER FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT. A civil suit filed by one of her past attorneys. The SAME issue my company KIOSK AD-VENTURE, INC is filing against her. Additionally, she fails to mention that she FAILED TO APPEAR in court on Aug 16th, 2011 concerning the pending judgment against her in the Oklahoma Courts. She also fails to mention that she was asking me to issue money to her in a DIFFERENT NAME and wanted it sent outside the country which is MONEY LAUNDERING and ILLEGAL. I refused. She also fails to mention that she has been involved in 8 lawsuits in the last 11 years. Kiosk Ad-Venture, Inc DID NOT write her a hot check. She was UNABLE TO CASH THE CHECK in her REAL NAME outside the country. I received an email from her on Sept 30th, 2011 (on file with the BURBANK POLICE DEPARTMENT) (2 days after her check cleared my bank) requesting a STOP PAYMENT and demanding a WIRE TRANSFER again in a different name than the check was received by my company. These are all obvious attempts to hide money from the CIVIL SUIT filed against her. I legal filed a STOP PAYMENT- DID NOT BOUNCE A CHECK as she has fraudulently claimed. SEE DOCUMENTATION BELOW:Date: 10-06-2011 02:34:38
    From: Sent Message
    Subject: Received stop payment request for account number ending in (...7949)
    Message:
    ECI:0243050375
    BUSINESS-AGENT-ECI:0242649876
    ACCTTYPE:null
    AOC:null

    Additionally she has filed false police reports which in California will get her thrown in jail and a very heavy fine.

    Finally, the money removed from her account was to help mitigate damages against my company caused by her games. The account has been frozen by the bank due to the fact they believe she was attempting to launder money. DO NOT ACCEPT ANY FURTHER FALSE INFORMATION FROM THIS PERSON TERRI LYNN FRAMEL ROBERTSON.

    Additionally she has a check from SCOTTRADE in the amount of $177,000 that she is now trying to get cashed and out of the country. DO NOT BE SUCKED IN BY HER SCAM LIKE I WAS. (SEE STOP PAYMENT DOCUMENT BELOW)

    Dear LORI H EILAR,

    We have received your stop payment request for check number 999991, which was issued to Terri Robertson for $91443.95

    You asked us to stop the payment because: Dispute

    Please Note:

    For personal accounts an online stop payment order is effective for 180 calendar days and may not be extended. However, you may place an additional stop payment order at that time, in which case such order shall replace the prior instruction, and shall be effective for 180 days from the day such additional stop order was placed.
    An additional stop payment fee will apply.

    For business accounts an online stop payment will be placed for one year and then renewable annually, at your choice, for six additional years. You will receive a 60 to 90 day advance notification of stop payments scheduled for renewal on your business account statement.



    Thank you for being a valued Chase customer.
  • Was this helpful?
  • WRONGLYACCUSED
  • WRONGLYACCUSED SBID #bd1e06f215
  • Posted 10/31/2013
  • The filer of this complaint is Terri Lynn Framel Robertson and now goes by Terri Smith on Facebook. Her false claims against me Lori Eilar and my company Kiosk Ad-Venture, Inc are slanderous and libel. Court suits are being filed against her and sites like this one is being used as proof of her slander and now her written LIBEL. What Ms Robertson fails to mention here is that her Court order of Protection against her ex husband John William Robertson in Oklahoma City was denied. She also fails to mention that she fled Oklahoma from a pending civil suits filed against her for breach of contract. A civil suit filed by one of her past attorneys. The same issue my company Kiosk Ad-Venture, Inc is filing against her. Additionally, she fails to mention that she "failed to appear" in court on Aug 16th, 2011 concerning the pending judgment against her in the Oklahoma Courts. She also fails to mention that she was asking me to issue money to her in a different name and wanted it sent outside the country which is money laundering and illegal. I refused. She also fails to mention that she has been involved in 8 lawsuits in the last 11 years. Kiosk Ad-Venture, Inc did not write her a hot check. She was unable to cash the check in her real name outside the country. I received an email from her on Sept 30th, 2011 (on file with the Burbank Police Department) (2 days after her check cleared my bank) requesting a stop payment and demanding a wire transfer again in a different name than the check received by my company. These are all obvious attempts to hide money from the civil suit filed against her. I legally filed a stop payment- I did not bounce a check as she has fraudulently claimed. See documentation below
    :Date: 10-06-2011 02:34:38
    From: Sent Message
    Subject: Received stop payment request for account number ending in (...7949)
    Message:
    ECI:0243050375
    BUSINESS-AGENT-ECI:0242649876
    ACCTTYPE:null
    AOC:null
    Dear LORI H EILAR,

    We have received your stop payment request for check number 999991, which was issued to Terri Robertson for $91443.95

    You asked us to stop the payment because: Dispute

    Please Note:

    For personal accounts an online stop payment order is effective for 180 calendar days and may not be extended. However, you may place an additional stop payment order at that time, in which case such order shall replace the prior instruction, and shall be effective for 180 days from the day such additional stop order was placed.
    An additional stop payment fee will apply.

    For business accounts an online stop payment will be placed for one year and then renewable annually, at your choice, for six additional years. You will receive a 60 to 90 day advance notification of stop payments scheduled for renewal on your business account statement.
    Thank you for being a valued Chase customer.

    Additionally she has filed false police reports which in California will get her thrown in jail and a very heavy fine.

    Finally, the money removed from her account was to help mitigate damages against my company caused by her games. The account has been frozen by the bank due to the fact they believe she was attempting to launder money. Do not accept any further false information from this individual and do not fall for her illegal scam. She presently has another check from a scottrade account in the amount of $177,000 she is trying to get someone else to cash for her. Do not fail for this scam.
  • Was this helpful?
  • WRONGLYACCUSED
  • WRONGLYACCUSED SBID #bd1e06f215
  • Posted 10/31/2013
  • The filer of this complaint is Terri Lynn Framel Robertson and now goes by Terri Smith on Facebook. Her false claims against me Lori Eilar and my company Kiosk Ad-Venture, Inc are slanderous and libel. Court suits are being filed against her and sites like this one is being used as proof of her slander and now her written LIBEL. What Ms Robertson fails to mention here is that her Court order of Protection against her ex husband John William Robertson in Oklahoma City was denied. She also fails to mention that she fled Oklahoma from a pending civil suits filed against her for breach of contract. A civil suit filed by one of her past attorneys. The same issue my company Kiosk Ad-Venture, Inc is filing against her. Additionally, she fails to mention that she "failed to appear" in court on Aug 16th, 2011 concerning the pending judgment against her in the Oklahoma Courts. She also fails to mention that she was asking me to issue money to her in a different name and wanted it sent outside the country which is money laundering and illegal. I refused. She also fails to mention that she has been involved in 8 lawsuits in the last 11 years. Kiosk Ad-Venture, Inc did not write her a hot check. She was unable to cash the check in her real name outside the country. I received an email from her on Sept 30th, 2011 (on file with the Burbank Police Department) (2 days after her check cleared my bank) requesting a stop payment and demanding a wire transfer again in a different name than the check received by my company. These are all obvious attempts to hide money from the civil suit filed against her. I legally filed a stop payment- I did not bounce a check as she has fraudulently claimed. See documentation below
  • Was this helpful?
  • Exposethetruth
  • Exposethetruth SBID #c19b371514
  • Posted 01/21/2014
  • I am an advocate for the family of Terri and her two small children. Lori Eilar of kiosk adventure Inc. has extorted over 100,000 from this woman and minor children. Lori Eilar has exploited and blackmailed Terri and her children. Terri and her two children have fled very serious abuse and for this woman to take thier means of support is a horrific crime. but to post lies to harm them even more, is hanus. Lori cliamed that Terri does not have a VPO. Terri and her children have a civil NO Contact order which is higher than a VPO. The children and the mother were given court approval to shelter themselves to a private address for thier protection. Terri and her children fled 15 years of domestic, physcial, emotional and economic abuse. Lori Eilar with no shame, no empathy, no remorse re-victimzed this family, took thier means of support, protection and slandered them after exorting 100,000 from them. And yes she wrote a hot check that bounced. Yes, she tried to exploit more money from her, and when her advocate said no, Lori Eilar began more blackmail threats. The mother and children are devistated by her crimes to them. Please support the mother and children.
    advocate of exposing the truth.
  • Was this helpful?
  • advocate
  • advocate SBID #10fe66f21d
  • Posted 01/26/2014
  • I am an advocate too of this family. I have seen predator type emails from Lori Eilar to this family 9/2011 where Lori has these grandios ideas to take Terri's money and open up accounts for her to protect and help Terri and her children. What Lori Eilar emails to Terri and others contradict her lies and slander in this post.
    Terri and her children VPO was transfered to the sealed divorce case and they were given a NO CONTACT order of protection. For Lori Eilar to post these domestic victims do not have court protection is appauling and should have the community against violent crimes outraged!
    Lori Eialr is a very skilled predator and appears to be a professional con.
    Terri has full legal and sole custody of her two children due to the horrific abuse by John William Robertson not only to her but to her children. John Robertson admitted to beating and bruising his family! Terre and her children were given court protection to move anywhere they would like for protection because John William Robertson was threatening more harm to them. Terri has a valid prenuptial agreement that protects her money. The prenuptial agreement says Terri has a right to her income and her separate property as if the marriage never existed. Singed by laywers, John, and notarized. Lori Eilar claming Terri is laundering her own money is complete slander and libel. But what is worse, is that Lori Eilar with full intent expoloited this family and penetrated their safety and stole 100,000 from them. Lori Eilar knowing that was their means of shelter, food and clothing. Lori Eilar did re-victimize this family not only by taking money from them, but now posting lies they are not protected victims of abuse. The world should be mortified that Lori Eilar has done this to Terri and two small children who have fled abuse, and trying to start their lives over abuse free, only to be scammed by Lori Eilar and her company Kiosk Adventure Inc.
  • Was this helpful?
  • advocate
  • advocate SBID #10fe66f21d
  • Posted 01/26/2014
  • Advocate correction. Lori Eilars predatory email to Terri I was referring to was 9/2010 where Lori Eilar was attempting to take money from her.
    In addition when Lori predators this family to try and extort money from them claiming to help them, then attacks them with threats and blackmial is criminal. To carry out threats and blackmail is proof of her extortion and blackmail.
    Avocates are helping Terri and her children be safe from Their abuser John Robertson and people helping him like Lori Eilar who for money to profit will put women and children in harm.
  • Was this helpful?
  • Exposethetruth
  • Exposethetruth SBID #10fe66f21d
  • Posted 01/26/2014
  • Advocates against violent crimes believe Lori Eilar should be arrested! Terri and her children have been through enough physical, mental and economic abuse from a very dangerous abuser John W. Robertson for many years.

    To now be a target by Lori Eilar to steal their money and then slander them when she was the one writing to Terri with her ideas on how she wanted to take and control Terri's personal retirement account!

    Clearly by all evidence Lori Eilar had full intent to steal it! Lori Eilar sent her a check that bounced! That is check writing fraud! Domestic violence experts that Lori Eilar fails to mention, when she tried to email them lies, told Lori Eilar, Terri and her children are in danger from their abuser and that Terri is the best chance the children have of being safe.

    Lori Eilar just saw an opportunity to predator a victim of their savings. And like a typical predator, Lori Eilar attacked them like a COBRA to cover up her crimes. Lori Eilar and her lies are documented and witnessed by advocates!

    The advocates against abuse and violent crimes is 100% supportive of Terri and her children and are here to help them through yet another horrific crime against them by Lori Eilar and her company Kiosk Adventure Inc.

    Lori Eilar extorted money she knew they needed for their basic needs! Terri and her children have legal court orders of protection for them! Blackmail and extortion and carrying out threats of harm to this poor family can get lori Eilar in jail for 10 plus years! Lori Eilars actions are documented and being investigated.

    Additional emails from Lori Eilar to Terri to con her out of her money have been confirmed that Lori Eilar lied about doing business with Gavin and Joe Maloof, which was confirmed. They never did!

    The entire group of exposethetruth, and advocates hope this family can soon heal from the crimes against them and hope they can trust again and realize not all people exploit others like Lori Eilar and people like her.
  • Was this helpful?
  • Exposethetruth
  • Exposethetruth SBID #10fe66f21d
  • Posted 01/26/2014
  • NOTE! Scambook should seriously help this woman and her children recover her money from Lori Eilar and stop this exploitation of victims of abuse! This site should not be used to cyber bully women and children and penetrating their safety and putting their lives in danger. Scambook should not promote this site to be used like lori Eilar with kiosk adventure Inc has done to exploit and blackmail and re-victimize women and children fleeing domestic abuse! We hope Scambook helps Terri and her children recover and help them heal!
  • Was this helpful?
  • survivors
  • survivors SBID #10fe66f21d
  • Posted 01/30/2014
  • My children I are survivors of Domestic abuse and crimes against us. It is time to set the record straight. Lori Eilar with Kiosk adventure Inc. has exploited my children and me. Lori Eilar has extorted over $100,000 of money that was intented for safety, refuge, protection and food for me and my children.

    Lori Eilar sent a predatory email to me and Susan Murphy Milano on 9/2011 attempting to extort more money with her grandios ideas of opening up accounts out of the country in her name, wanting to control my money claiming to help me and my children have a home and be safe. (contradicts her lies in this post)

    Susan emailed her and said that we are waiting for the funds she took to be sent back to me. Lori Eilar sent a $91,455.00 check to me. Lori Eilar embezzled money out of the account with full intent so it would bounce.

    The money in the account was 100% mine, opened up for and with my money, not her's. Lori Eilar took advantage of our vulnerablility being in shelters and fleeing very serious abuse and used fear to blackmail us to steal our money.

    Lori claims in this post it bounced becuase it was sent out of the country. That is a lie. It was presented to matt at Chase/US and he said she had taken out enough for it to bounce. It was then presented to Chase from my bank in USA. The check bounced, this is check fruad! (proof and witness's)

    Lori claims we have no order of protection. (her lies again)
    John Robertson abused me and my children.
    He admitted to beating and bruising. He tried to Kill me.
    I have full sole legal custody of children.
    We have a NO CONTACT order against John Robertson
    John Robertson has no visitations due to his abuse to us.
    We were given court orders to allow us to relocate to a private address anywhere with no forward address due to John Robertson threats of MORE harm to us.

    Lori Eilar has committed serious crimes to us and slander to penetrate our court legal rights for refuge, protection & safety.
  • Was this helpful?
  • WRONGLYACCUSED
  • WRONGLYACCUSED SBID #6bd4e3c7c5
  • Posted 01/30/2014
  • December 1, 2011





    Terri Lynn Framel Robertson- aka Terri Smith
    P.O. Box 14946
    Surfside Beach, South Carolina 29587


    VIA CERTIFIED MAIL


    RE: DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST AND RETRACT LIBEL


    Dear Ms. Robertson,
    Please be advised that I represent Kiosk Ad-Venture, Inc, (“KAV”) in their corporate matters, including but not limited to advice regarding and management of its litigation. It is my understanding that you have engaged in an ongoing campaign of libelous misinformation against KAV, its officers and representatives (collectively, the “KAV Parties”) designed to defame them as retribution for their unwillingness to participate in your attempted criminal enterprises.
    Defamation, which consists of both libel and slander, is defined by case law and statute in California. See Cal. Civ. Code §§ 44, 45a, and 46.
    Attendant to these sources the elements of a defamation claim have been determined to be:
    1. publication of a statement of fact
    2. that is false,
    3. unprivileged,
    4. has a natural tendency to injure or which causes "special damage," and
    5. the defendant's fault in publishing the statement amounted to at least negligence.
    “Publication”, which may be written or oral, is defined as communication to a third person who understands the defamatory meaning of the statement and its application to the person to whom reference is made. Publication need not be to the “public” at large; communication to a single individual other than the plaintiff is sufficient.
    The primary publications of concern include the following:
    1. Posting at Scambook.com dated 9/19/2011 with the subject header “Kiosk Ad-venture Inc Lori Eilar - Other for $101,455.95 on 09/19/2011” :

    “We are victims of domestic abuse and in shelters. She said she would help us. She told me to give her a short term loan from my IRA and she would give us our money back in that same month so he could not find and track us down. I did and as soon as she cashed my check, she started to blackmail, and extort the money and threaten the safety of me and my children and tell us she was going to tell him where we are in our safe houses. Then she wrote a hot check to me for $91,455.95 and kept 10,000 of my money IRA. But that check bounced. She was taking money out of this account. She said she was going to put my name on the account but never did. chase bank said she was taking money out so the check would bounce. She is now attacking me to justify her theft and scam. She lied about this business and she is a fraud. We are araid for not only our lives but now she left us without our funds that we need to survive and have shelter. Please help us.”

    2. Your statement to the Burbank Police Department (made in the course of filing a police report against Ms. Lori Eilar, President of KAV) stating that Ms. Eilar had threatened you and the safety of your children.

    3. Your statements in a phone conversation with Mr. Jim Kidd, (Owner of Square1 and PayCenter1) – the precise content of which has yet to be determined, but which in substantive part, impugned the business practices of KAV.
    Despite what you may have been misled to believe regarding the freedom to publish whatever you see fit on the Internet, that is not the case, and the same protections offered to victims of more traditional malicious publishing are available to those similarly damaged by website postings.
    All of the statements you made in the foregoing publications involve allegations of fact, which we can quite simply prove to be untrue, and though not required as a matter of law, we can additionally prove that you are and have been fully aware of the falsity of these statements since the time that you made them. You will note, however, that in cases involving matters of purely private concern such as this, the burden of proving truth is on the defendant. See Smith v. Maldonado, 72 Cal.App.4th 637, 646 & n.5 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999).
    In brief summary :
    1. The loan you provided to KAV was never intended to be “short term,” nor did KAV agree to be complicit in an attempt by you to launder money. The check you provided KAV was annotated as it was intended during your discussions with KAV: as a loan to a business, which might, absent evidence to the contrary, be reasonably assumed to be a business loan. Outside of your imagination, no such evidence exists. Further, it is plain that you used a “bait-and-switch” tactic, preying on the cash needs of KAV to get KAV to agree to accept your loan absent a formal loan agreement to allow you the ability to make the outrageous claims in your statements above, in an attempt to coerce KAV to comply with your illicit scheme. Unfortunately, the law protects private citizens from defamation of this sort by forcing tortfeasors to meet the burden of proof before being allowed to threaten them with baseless allegations. Further, any checks written to you that were ultimately not honored were due your own requests for “stop payments” because the attempted payments were not complicit with your laundering scheme, and were therefore not “hot checks.” Chase Bank denies making the purported statement, and you have produced no evidence of the same – when it is their stated corporate practice to make any statements responsive to fraud allegations in writing. Or to put it simply, if they had made such a statement you would be able to produce it readily. None of the KAV Parties has perpetrated a “theft”, a “scam”, a “lie” or a “fraud”, and you have provided nothing aside from these bare allegations to prove otherwise. Which is unsurprising, because I am confident you will ultimately be unable to do so. Finally, none of the KAV parties knew of your whereabouts in any “safe houses” or the contact information for anyone alleged to be threatening you harm, so any related allegations are false on their face.

    2. As above, none of the KAV Parties has ever made any colorable threat to you, your children or the physical safety of either.

    In light of the relevant California law, if you do, in fact, have proof of any of the factual allegations you have made, you are invited to produce it, and in those instances we will be happy to abandon our demands related thereto.

    On the issue of damages, it is highly likely that the overwhelming majority of any defamation claims brought by KAV and/or the KAV Parties against you would be pled as defamation per se because you have either (a) accused the subject parties of a crime, or (b) have impugned the business practices thereof. However, this notwithstanding, the KAV Parties have sustained substantial damages as a result of your conduct, and feel confident in claiming damages well in excess of ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000).

    Further, your actions raise additional causes of action, including but not limited to: tortious interference with contract, wire fraud, and negligence – and we reserve the right to include these causes of action in any civil claim against you.

    Though they stand ready to proceed in the pursuit of all equitable and legal remedies available to them, my clients would like to resolve this matter in advance of such action if you are willing comply with the following demands:

    1. Immediately cease and desist from any defamatory statements regarding the KAV Parties;

    2. Within ten (10) days, removal of any electronically published statement regarding the KAV Parties which is visible to the public; and

    3. Within ten (10) days contact Mr. Jim Kidd (PayCenter1, Inc) and retract, without reservation, all defamatory statements made thereto and ask him to reinstate their agreement with KAV.
    Your agreement to comply with these demands must also be accompanied by a signed statement from you, acknowledging such agreement, and noting your intended course of action. The ten (10) day periods noted above will not toll until the record date of such statement. However, I must be in receipt of the required statement no later than December 16, 2011.
    PLEASE NOTE that in the absence of your agreement to comply with these demands, my client reserves the right to proceed with litigation without any further notice to you. Further, KAV reserves all rights related to claims it may have now or in the future against you or your affiliates.
    You are encouraged to retain independent counsel to assist you in the assessment of this correspondence, and are reminded that as KAV has notified you of my representation following this transmission, to please direct any and all correspondence in this matter exclusively to my attention.
    Please don’t hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
    Sincerely,


    Glenn H. Truitt, Esq.

    Cc: Lori Eilar, President, Kiosk Ad-Ventures, Inc.




    Glenn H. Truitt, Esq. 877-897-9701
  • Was this helpful?
  • WRONGLYACCUSED
  • WRONGLYACCUSED SBID #6bd4e3c7c5
  • Posted 01/30/2014
  • December 1, 2011





    Terri Lynn Framel Robertson- aka Terri Smith
    P.O. Box 14946
    Surfside Beach, South Carolina 29587


    VIA CERTIFIED MAIL


    RE: DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST AND RETRACT LIBEL


    Dear Ms. Robertson,
    Please be advised that I represent Kiosk Ad-Venture, Inc, (“KAV”) in their corporate matters, including but not limited to advice regarding and management of its litigation. It is my understanding that you have engaged in an ongoing campaign of libelous misinformation against KAV, its officers and representatives (collectively, the “KAV Parties”) designed to defame them as retribution for their unwillingness to participate in your attempted criminal enterprises.
    Defamation, which consists of both libel and slander, is defined by case law and statute in California. See Cal. Civ. Code §§ 44, 45a, and 46.
    Attendant to these sources the elements of a defamation claim have been determined to be:
    1. publication of a statement of fact
    2. that is false,
    3. unprivileged,
    4. has a natural tendency to injure or which causes "special damage," and
    5. the defendant's fault in publishing the statement amounted to at least negligence.
    “Publication”, which may be written or oral, is defined as communication to a third person who understands the defamatory meaning of the statement and its application to the person to whom reference is made. Publication need not be to the “public” at large; communication to a single individual other than the plaintiff is sufficient.
    The primary publications of concern include the following:
    1. Posting at Scambook.com dated 9/19/2011 with the subject header “Kiosk Ad-venture Inc Lori Eilar - Other for $101,455.95 on 09/19/2011” :

    “We are victims of domestic abuse and in shelters. She said she would help us. She told me to give her a short term loan from my IRA and she would give us our money back in that same month so he could not find and track us down. I did and as soon as she cashed my check, she started to blackmail, and extort the money and threaten the safety of me and my children and tell us she was going to tell him where we are in our safe houses. Then she wrote a hot check to me for $91,455.95 and kept 10,000 of my money IRA. But that check bounced. She was taking money out of this account. She said she was going to put my name on the account but never did. chase bank said she was taking money out so the check would bounce. She is now attacking me to justify her theft and scam. She lied about this business and she is a fraud. We are araid for not only our lives but now she left us without our funds that we need to survive and have shelter. Please help us.”

    2. Your statement to the Burbank Police Department (made in the course of filing a police report against Ms. Lori Eilar, President of KAV) stating that Ms. Eilar had threatened you and the safety of your children.

    3. Your statements in a phone conversation with Mr. Jim Kidd, (Owner of Square1 and PayCenter1) – the precise content of which has yet to be determined, but which in substantive part, impugned the business practices of KAV.
    Despite what you may have been misled to believe regarding the freedom to publish whatever you see fit on the Internet, that is not the case, and the same protections offered to victims of more traditional malicious publishing are available to those similarly damaged by website postings.
    All of the statements you made in the foregoing publications involve allegations of fact, which we can quite simply prove to be untrue, and though not required as a matter of law, we can additionally prove that you are and have been fully aware of the falsity of these statements since the time that you made them. You will note, however, that in cases involving matters of purely private concern such as this, the burden of proving truth is on the defendant. See Smith v. Maldonado, 72 Cal.App.4th 637, 646 & n.5 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999).
    In brief summary :
    1. The loan you provided to KAV was never intended to be “short term,” nor did KAV agree to be complicit in an attempt by you to launder money. The check you provided KAV was annotated as it was intended during your discussions with KAV: as a loan to a business, which might, absent evidence to the contrary, be reasonably assumed to be a business loan. Outside of your imagination, no such evidence exists. Further, it is plain that you used a “bait-and-switch” tactic, preying on the cash needs of KAV to get KAV to agree to accept your loan absent a formal loan agreement to allow you the ability to make the outrageous claims in your statements above, in an attempt to coerce KAV to comply with your illicit scheme. Unfortunately, the law protects private citizens from defamation of this sort by forcing tortfeasors to meet the burden of proof before being allowed to threaten them with baseless allegations. Further, any checks written to you that were ultimately not honored were due your own requests for “stop payments” because the attempted payments were not complicit with your laundering scheme, and were therefore not “hot checks.” Chase Bank denies making the purported statement, and you have produced no evidence of the same – when it is their stated corporate practice to make any statements responsive to fraud allegations in writing. Or to put it simply, if they had made such a statement you would be able to produce it readily. None of the KAV Parties has perpetrated a “theft”, a “scam”, a “lie” or a “fraud”, and you have provided nothing aside from these bare allegations to prove otherwise. Which is unsurprising, because I am confident you will ultimately be unable to do so. Finally, none of the KAV parties knew of your whereabouts in any “safe houses” or the contact information for anyone alleged to be threatening you harm, so any related allegations are false on their face.

    2. As above, none of the KAV Parties has ever made any colorable threat to you, your children or the physical safety of either.

    In light of the relevant California law, if you do, in fact, have proof of any of the factual allegations you have made, you are invited to produce it, and in those instances we will be happy to abandon our demands related thereto.

    On the issue of damages, it is highly likely that the overwhelming majority of any defamation claims brought by KAV and/or the KAV Parties against you would be pled as defamation per se because you have either (a) accused the subject parties of a crime, or (b) have impugned the business practices thereof. However, this notwithstanding, the KAV Parties have sustained substantial damages as a result of your conduct, and feel confident in claiming damages well in excess of ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000).

    Further, your actions raise additional causes of action, including but not limited to: tortious interference with contract, wire fraud, and negligence – and we reserve the right to include these causes of action in any civil claim against you.

    Though they stand ready to proceed in the pursuit of all equitable and legal remedies available to them, my clients would like to resolve this matter in advance of such action if you are willing comply with the following demands:

    1. Immediately cease and desist from any defamatory statements regarding the KAV Parties;

    2. Within ten (10) days, removal of any electronically published statement regarding the KAV Parties which is visible to the public; and

    3. Within ten (10) days contact Mr. Jim Kidd (PayCenter1, Inc) and retract, without reservation, all defamatory statements made thereto and ask him to reinstate their agreement with KAV.
    Your agreement to comply with these demands must also be accompanied by a signed statement from you, acknowledging such agreement, and noting your intended course of action. The ten (10) day periods noted above will not toll until the record date of such statement. However, I must be in receipt of the required statement no later than December 16, 2011.
    PLEASE NOTE that in the absence of your agreement to comply with these demands, my client reserves the right to proceed with litigation without any further notice to you. Further, KAV reserves all rights related to claims it may have now or in the future against you or your affiliates.
    You are encouraged to retain independent counsel to assist you in the assessment of this correspondence, and are reminded that as KAV has notified you of my representation following this transmission, to please direct any and all correspondence in this matter exclusively to my attention.
    Please don’t hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
    Sincerely,


    Glenn H. Truitt, Esq.

    Cc: Lori Eilar, President, Kiosk Ad-Ventures, Inc.




    Glenn H. Truitt, Esq. 877-897-9701
  • Was this helpful?
  • WRONGLYACCUSED
  • WRONGLYACCUSED SBID #6bd4e3c7c5
  • Posted 01/30/2014
  • Now we have absolute PROOF you have receipt of this Cease and Desist. This includes any of your family members contacting me, advocates etc. All you have to do is sue my company if you think we have done anything to you and prove it in a court of law. A place that requires FACTS and not your drama that I have listened to for over 20 years. Why don't you ask yourself why YOU are always playing this victim. Is it possible that EVERYONE is after you?????? That you have caused no harm to anyone else. I would love to get you into court myself and present the nearly $1,000,000 in damages you have caused to my company. EVERY POST YOUR MAKE ANYWHERE ON THE INTERNET ADDS TO MY CASE.
  • Was this helpful?
  • advocate
  • advocate SBID #10fe66f21d
  • Posted 01/30/2014
  • Embezzlement definition;
    The fraudulent appropriation of funds or property entrusted to your care but actually owned by someone else.

    FACT- Lori Eilar embezzled money from Terri and her children and yes, there is proof, emails, witness's.

    FACT - Lori Eilar knew the $100,000 was for food, shelter, clothing, protection and school for Terri's children, and to get them a home, safety, not for Lori to embezzle and take from them.

    FACT - Susan Murphy Milano national homicide prevention expert was helping Terri and her children put in safety measures and prevent John Robertson from finding his family and harming them again or worse killing them. Terri followed susan's advice and Lori took advantage of Terri and her children when they were vulnerable so she could extort money from them. After reading these emails, Susan Murphy Milano emailed Terri; Lori should be arrested!

    FACT Miss Eilar you worte a "hot" $91,443.95 check and posted on laywer.com that you took the money out for your own use right before Terri presented the check in the USA, so the check would bounce. Miss Eilar, that is check fraud and more than civil it is a felony. These posts, and other posts of conspiracy to harm Terri and her children have been printed!

    FACT - Lori posts, slander, threats on this site, and other sites and in emails and in letters and on calls. All proof of her blackmail threats to this family after she embezzled and extorted $100,000 from Terri and her children who are homeless and fleeing abuse!

    FACT - the $100,000 is Terri and her chlidren money, not Lori Eilars to take and use as she wished.

    FACT - Lori Eilar threatened this poor family fleeing abuse with threats to help their abuser just so Miss Eilar can get away with keeping their money.

    THAT IS BLACKMAIL MISS EILAR! THREATS THAT MORE HARM WILL COME TO TERRI AND HER MINOR CHILDREN IF THEY STAND UP TO YOU TO GET THEIR MONEY BACK IS CRIMNAL!

    AND YOUR CONTINUED THREATS IS PROOF OF EXTORTION!
  • Was this helpful?
  • advocate
  • advocate SBID #10fe66f21d
  • Posted 01/30/2014
  • ADDITIONAL FACTS-Miss Eilar is misleading scambook, the internet and even her own lawyer to continue to harass Terri and her children. And with full force and blackmail threats to try and keep Terri and her children from getting Terri's money that they need to survive, eat and stay alive!

    What right Miss Lori Eilar do you believe you have, that you can just take $100,000 from a domestic violence victim, living in a shelter, who you lied to, predatored to get her money, then claim to "protect her and her children" so she will trust you. Then like a COBRA attack her with threats so you can keep her money and not allowing Terri to support, feed, and house her children? This is maximum betrayal!

    FACT - Miss Eilar lies on other posts, like lawyer.com. Miss Eilar in this posts Warn Terri to tell her family not to call her or else......How can you tell her to tell her family not to call you when you claim on lawyer.com that quote "I even contacted her father to see if I could send the payments to him and even he doesn't have numbers for her"

    After her father saw this post of your lies about him, he called you and said Ok, give me my daughters money. So now, you lie about her family and threaten more money to sue if they call you on your lies about them too? When do you stop harrasing three generations of this family Lori Eilar?

    FACT - Lori Eilar emails Terri's advocates and demeans Terri to try and cover up her crimes to Terri and her children. The advocate emails lori and tells her that Terri is the best chance that these children have to staying safe from their abuser! Lori agrees with the advocate, But then attacks Terri right after she contacts her advocates? And then threatens Terri again by saying; Terri you better not have your advocates contact me....When Lori Eilar is the one contacting Terri's family and emailing HER advocates.

    Terri behavior fleeing an abuser is normal.
    Lori Eilar behavior exploiting Terri and her family is INSANE!
  • Was this helpful?

Do You Have a Complaint?

Add a complaint and spread the word. High volume complaints have a better chance to get their money back. Submit a report and join forces with others like you!

Submit a Complaint Now

Business Profile Summary

  • Kiosk Ad-venture Inc  Lori Eilar logo

Company Statistics

  • Complaint Against Kiosk Ad-venture Inc Lori Eilar
  • Complaints Filed: 1
  • Reported Damages: $101,455.95
Visit Complete Company Profile

What is SBID?

SBID is a unique id code that identifies the user's computer and location. SBID is used to prevent fraudulent postings and help our community find users who create duplicate user accounts.